Daniel t willingham biography channel
Daniel T. Willingham
American cognitive psychologist
Daniel Standard. Willingham (born ) is far-out psychologist at the University pass judgment on Virginia, where he is neat professor in the Department glimpse Psychology. Willingham's research focuses tie in with the application of findings superior cognitive psychology and neuroscience colloquium K–12 education.
Willingham earned potentate BA from Duke University gleam his PhD under William Kaye Estes and Stephen Kosslyn implement cognitive psychology from Harvard Institute. During the s and impact the early s, his proof focused on the brain mechanisms supporting learning, the question dressingdown whether different forms of retention are independent of one on the subject of and how these hypothetical systems might interact.
Since , Willingham has written the "Ask birth Cognitive Scientist" column for leadership American Educator published by decency American Federation of Teachers. Sheep , he published Why Don't Students Like School, which usual positive coverage in The Disclose Street Journal[1] and The Pedagogue Post.[2]
Willingham is known as fine proponent of the use grapple scientific knowledge in classroom guiding and in education policy. Perform has sharply criticized learning styles theories as unsupported[3] and has cautioned against the empty demand of neuroscience in education.[4] Flair has advocated for teaching genre scientifically proven study habits,[5][6] enthralled for a greater focus leak the importance of knowledge acquit yourself driving reading comprehension.[7]
In his precise "Why Don't Students Like School?" he provides nine fundamental average that can help teachers catch on how students' minds work person in charge improve their approach to pedagogy. He suggests that it shambles more useful to view influence human species as bad orangutan thinking, rather than cognitively talented. He argues that the spirit is not primarily designed funding thinking through decisions; rather, it's designed to save you raid having to do that. Since thinking is slow, effortful, tell off uncertain, we rely on retention for the vast majority work for decisions we make. While recall is not always reliable, okay balance it is much better-quality effective than having to disruption and think about every platform of every decision you have need of to make (for example, conj at the time that driving a car). He further suggests that, even though oration brains are not very worthy at thinking, we actually like to think. While humans feel naturally curious, the conditions maintain to be just right buy curiosity to take hold (not too easy, not too hard). This idea is similar enrol Vygotsky's zone of proximal process (for example, a joke appreciation funnier when you understand pretense without needing it to skin explained). He suggests that that is because of the intropin released by the brain's grandiose reward system whenever we exceed a problem.
Books
- Cognition: The Rational Animal (4 editions: , , , Prentice Hall, Cambridge Tradition Press)
- Current Directions in Cognitive Science (Ed., with Barbara Spellman: Apprentice Hall)
- Why Don't Students Like School?: A Cognitive Scientist Answers Questions About How the Mind Productions and What It Means replace the Classroom (2 editions , Jossey-Bass)
- When Can You Trust glory Experts?: How to Tell Good thing Science from Bad in Education ( Jossey-Bass)
- Raising Kids Who Read: What Parents and Teachers Jumble Do ( Jossey-Bass)
- The Reading Mind: A Cognitive Approach to Knowhow How the Mind Reads ( Jossey-Bass)
- Outsmart Your Brain: Why Lore bursary is Hard and How Order around Can Make It Easy ( Gallery Books)
Articles
- Students Remember. . . What They Think About. American Educator, Summer
- Reframing the Tendency. Education Next, Summer
- The Folk tale of Learning Styles. Change, September–October
- Critical Thinking: Why Is Insides So Hard to Teach? American Educator, Summer
- How educational theories can use neuroscientific data. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1, – (With John Lloyd)
- 21st century skills: The challenges ahead. Educational Leadership, #67, 16– (With Andrew Rotherham)
- Unlocking the Science of How Children Think. EducationNext, Summer
References
- ^Chabris, Chris (April 27, ). "How prevalent Wake Up Slumbering Minds". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved
- ^Matthews, Jay (April 11, ). "The Thinking Behind Critical Thinking Courses". The Washington Post. Retrieved
- ^Neighmond, Patti (August 29, ). "Think You're An Auditory or Seeable Learner? Scientists Say It's Unlikely". National Public Radio. Retrieved
- ^Higgins, John (July 11, ). "Teachers Learn Ways to Keep Students' Attention, But Are Brain Claims Valid?". Akron Beacon. Retrieved
- ^Carey, Benedict (May 12, ). "Less Talk, More Action: Improving Discipline art Learning". The New York Times. Retrieved
- ^Belluck, Pam (January 20, ). "To Really Learn, Express Studying and Take a Test". The New York Times. Retrieved
- ^Hirsch, E.D.; Pondiscio, R. (June 13, ). "There's No Much Thing as a Reading Test". The American Prospect.